Comments on: Top Ten Photoshop Disasters and Controversies

By: Ridiculous «

Ridiculous « — Sun, 01 May 2011 17:36:28 +0000

[...] Click away for more haha This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← color me light, color me dark New Photoshoot(s)! → LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

By: Ridiculous «

Ridiculous « — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 05:17:05 +0000

[...] Click away for more haha On the PopPressed Radar Print Magazine's New Visual Artists Saint Petersburg Unveils Primorskiy Zoological Park with Geodesic Domes What One Does In Paris if One is a Carter or Knowles This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← WOW! LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]

By: valeratal

valeratal — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:31:28 +0000

Cool Foto and Cool photoshopping !

By: Tony Coleby

Tony Coleby — Mon, 03 May 2010 14:24:13 +0000

Re The Haiti photo: I agree – the photographer was well within his artistic rights to simply enhance the colour. The judges must have been old-school film freaks who hate digital. This is the 21st century.

By: Meagan

Meagan — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 05:12:56 +0000

The picture of the basketball players is not badly photoshopped. If you look closely, the “headless” player is just being caught at a weird angle. You can see part of his hair and ear implying that his head was falling to the side, out of range of the camera. It is poor photography and poor editing, not overly photoshopped. The other ones were pretty intense though.

By: Top Ten Photoshop Disasters and Controversies | Web Design … | JOHNDAVE DECANO

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:18:10 +0000

[...] post: Top Ten Photoshop Disasters and Controversies | Web Design … [...]

By: bmackler

bmackler — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:20:11 +0000

Very interesting point, but I think at the end of the day the photographer was guilty of editorializing the photo. To change the saturation and contrast (along with other things I am sure) that much (as you call it, heavy handed) altered the overall feel and emotion of the scene. It no longer was capturing a scene of devastation but became a product of post production editing and special effects. The question remains, what is the line that can not be crossed? From what I understand, the photographer did not protest his disqualification which says alot as well.

By: Ivan Farkas

Ivan Farkas — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:46:26 +0000

Re: the Haiti photos, I side with the photographer. As far as I can see, he did not introduce any extraneous elements, only took the bloodless “original” photo and added contrast and saturation. A bit heavy-handed, maybe, but certainly not dishonest. I can’t believe that under the scorching Haitian sun, the original scene looked as bland as the base photograph rendered by the camera. Had he taken it in Kodachrome II (anybody remember it?) it probably would have looked as snappy as Christensen’s submitted picture.

By: Julia Harwood

Julia Harwood — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:36:08 +0000

Yes its easy to get carried away with photoshop, good examples of how not to do it.

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:06:45 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by eva_smith: Top Ten Photoshop Disasters and Controversies: http://j.mp/3CEQLF #beatcancer…